Scarf vs Reo.dev
Compare Scarf and Reo.dev across download visibility, documentation, telemetry, privacy, integrations, and deployment control.
“We have been using Scarf to understand how Redpanda is being adopted, and most importantly, how to prioritize engineering efforts for the product. Turns out the world loves Redpanda + Kubernetes more than we thought!”
Trusted By
How do Scarf and Reo.dev compare?
Scarf is purpose-built for open source teams that need first-party usage data they can collect and control. It tracks downloads, packages, documentation, and product telemetry without storing PII by default, and Scarf Gateway can run in your infrastructure.
If your project is OSS-focused, privacy matters, or your project operates inside an open source foundation, Scarf is a much stronger choice.
| Feature | Scarf | Reo.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Usage and adoption signals | ||
| Container and package downloads | Yes First-party download signals are a core Scarf data source. | Yes |
| Direct Maven Central integration | Yes Connect Maven Central directly to Scarf. | No |
| File and API download tracking | Yes Scarf Gateway can sit in front of any file type or API. | No |
| CLI and product telemetry | Yes Scarf SDKs, custom telemetry, and event import support first-party usage signals. | Yes |
| First-party documentation activity | Yes Scarf Pixels measure documentation and content activity without cookies or JavaScript. | Yes |
| Documentation rendered on third-party domains | Yes Scarf Pixels can be embedded where the content is rendered. | No |
| Competitive and complementary technology signals | Yes Scarf combines first-party open source usage with supported third-party data. | Yes |
| Historical usage data | Yes | No |
| Control and open source | ||
| Zero PII stored by default | Yes Scarf does not store PII by default. | No |
| Self-hostable gateway | Yes Scarf Gateway is self-hostable and can run in your infrastructure. | No |
| Open source product components | Yes Scarf open sources everything we can. | No |
| Approved for use inside major OSS foundations | Yes Scarf is approved for use inside every major open source foundation. | No |
| Go-to-market workflows | ||
| CRM integrations | Yes Scarf publishes CRM integrations and CRM add-ons in its plans. | Yes |
| CSV and data exports | Yes Scarf supports exports, APIs, feeds, and raw data delivery by plan. | Yes |
| Developer community listening | No Scarf focuses on usage, adoption, documentation, and telemetry signals. | Yes |
| Buyer and decision-maker identification | No Scarf surfaces account-level usage and separately offers contact-level lead generation. | Yes |
| Campaign and outreach execution | No Scarf sends intelligence to GTM systems rather than operating as a campaign platform. | Yes |
| Contact-level lead generation | Yes Scarf offers Open Source Qualified Leads as a feed product. | Yes |
| AI-enabled insights | Yes Scarf AI supports natural-language analysis over Scarf data. | Yes |
