Scarf vs Reo.dev
We have been using Scarf to understand how Redpanda is being adopted, and most importantly, how to prioritize engineering efforts for the product. Turns out the world loves Redpanda + Kubernetes more than we thought!
Alexander Gallego
Trusted By
Reo.Dev vs Scarf – Feature Overview
Container downloads
File-based downloads (homebrew packages, .targz files, .deb files, etc)
npm downloads/installs
CLI commands
GitHub Release Downloads
Open Source Telemetry
First party domain developer docs
Third party domain developer docs (your markdown/content rendered on 3rd party websites, like DockerHub)
Usage of other complementary, competitive, strategic technologies and OSS packages.
Historical usage data
Slack community
Developer Social
Purchase Intent Signals [Team Evaluations, Enterprise Interest]
Buying Committee
Native integrations
CRM
Cloud bucket (AWS, GCP)
DB / Data warehouse
Outreach automation
Common Room
Other
Contact-level lead generation
LLM-enabled insights to ask anything from your data in real time.
Yes, on globally distributed, production-grade infrastructure.
Yes
Yes, simply add our widely downloaded npm package as a dependency.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, with high coverage from usage data + 3rd party data.
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, but gateway infrastructure is less mature. Lacks global redundancy, and a public status page.
No, telemetry on code execution only
Requires handwritten runtime telemetry via their npm package. Runtime only.
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Limited coverage to public community data + 3rd party data.
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
?
?
Yes
N/A
Yes
Yes
